I have a slow level generation algorithm that freezes the main thread when it runs. I found this post which is exactly the same problem, but predates the Jobs system.

All the jobs examples I found are good for parallelizing a bunch of instances of some function but the JobHandle.Complete() still pauses the main loop until they are done. Is there a way to offload a function that will take several frames to complete with Jobs?

Or am I better off creating a thread manually as suggested in that other post?

Thanks

Edit

In response to DMGregory's comment, I see I don't need to call Complete() for it to run.

This code seems to work, is it safe?

public class JobTest : MonoBehaviour
{
    JobHandle myJob;
    bool started = false;
    bool done = false;
    void Update()
    {
        if (!started)
        {
            if (Time.realtimeSinceStartup > 5)
            {
                print("scheduling");
                myJob = scheduleLongJob();
                JobHandle.ScheduleBatchedJobs(); 
                started = true;
            }
        }

        if (myJob.IsCompleted && started)
        {
            print("job completed");
            done = true;
        }        
    }
    JobHandle scheduleLongJob()
    {
        LongJob myJob = new LongJob();
        return myJob.Schedule(); 
    }
}

public struct LongJob : IJob
{
    public void Execute()
    {
        float u = 0;
        for (int i = 0; i < 50000000; i++)
        {
            u += math.exp10(math.sqrt(10f));
        }
        Debug.Log(u);
    }
}

I have a slow level generation algorithm that freezes the main thread when it runs. I found this post which is exactly the same problem, but predates the Jobs system.

All the jobs examples I found are good for parallelizing a bunch of instances of some function but the JobHandle.Complete() still pauses the main loop until they are done. Is there a way to offload a function that will take several frames to complete with Jobs?

Or am I better off creating a thread manually as suggested in that other post?

Thanks

I have a slow level generation algorithm that freezes the main thread when it runs. I found this post which is exactly the same problem, but predates the Jobs system.

All the jobs examples I found are good for parallelizing a bunch of instances of some function but the JobHandle.Complete() still pauses the main loop until they are done. Is there a way to offload a function that will take several frames to complete with Jobs?

Or am I better off creating a thread manually as suggested in that other post?

Thanks

I have a slow level generation algorithm that freezes the main thread when it runs. I found this post which is exactly the same problem, but predates the Jobs system.

All the jobs examples I found are good for parallelizing a bunch of instances of some function but the JobHandle.Complete() still pauses the main loop until they are done. Is there a way to offload a function that will take several frames to complete with Jobs?

Or am I better off creating a thread manually as suggested in that other post?

Thanks

Edit

In response to DMGregory's comment, I see I don't need to call Complete() for it to run.

This code seems to work, is it safe?

public class JobTest : MonoBehaviour
{
    JobHandle myJob;
    bool started = false;
    bool done = false;
    void Update()
    {
        if (!started)
        {
            if (Time.realtimeSinceStartup > 5)
            {
                print("scheduling");
                myJob = scheduleLongJob();
                JobHandle.ScheduleBatchedJobs(); 
                started = true;
            }
        }

        if (myJob.IsCompleted && started)
        {
            print("job completed");
            done = true;
        }        
    }
    JobHandle scheduleLongJob()
    {
        LongJob myJob = new LongJob();
        return myJob.Schedule(); 
    }
}

public struct LongJob : IJob
{
    public void Execute()
    {
        float u = 0;
        for (int i = 0; i < 50000000; i++)
        {
            u += math.exp10(math.sqrt(10f));
        }
        Debug.Log(u);
    }
}