Leadership Impact On Decision Making

Hire people BETTER THAN YOU and DIFFERENT TO YOU… Then LEARN FROM THEM. 🙏🏾 Sounds straightforward, doesn't it? Yet, why do so many leaders still struggle to grasp it? It’s because there's often hidden complexity beneath the surface. For example: 👀 Insecurity: Some leaders want to maintain the perception of being the smartest or most capable in the room. Therefore, surrounding themselves with highly skilled individuals could make them feel inadequate or threatened. 🔐 Need for Control: Hiring “less competent” team members could ensure that the leader remains the central figure, exerting control over important matters. 😱 Fear of Challenge: A diverse team can bring different viewpoints that might challenge the leader's ideas and decisions. 🧘🏾♂️ Comfort Zone: Some leaders prefer familiarity and ease, preventing them from being pushed out of their boundaries. ❤️ Misguided Loyalty: Leaders might adopt favouritism and hire people based on personal relationships or loyalties. 🤔 Short-Term Thinking: Hiring less skilled individuals could be a short-sighted approach to save costs or meet immediate needs, ignoring the long-term benefits of a talented and diverse team. 🤷🏾♂️ Lack of Awareness: Some leaders might just not fully recognise the value of diversity or the importance of surrounding themselves with skilled individuals. Leaders like the above ☝🏽are missing out on: 🧠 Amplified Intelligence: “Fuse Minds" Surrounding yourself with smarter people boosts team intelligence. Just like a puzzle, different pieces fit together to create a whole that's stronger than its parts. 🚀 Fast-Track Growth: “Learn from Experts" Learning from the best accelerates personal growth. Imagine being on a rocket powered by knowledge and experience – you'll reach your goals faster. 🤔 Constant Innovation: “Open Doors" Humility opens doors to innovation. Acknowledging that you don't know everything encourages openness to fresh ideas and creative solutions. 🏋️♂️ Informed Choices: “Embrace Thought Variety" Embracing diversity of thought leads to well-rounded decisions. Different perspectives catch what others might miss, reducing blind spots. 🤝 Unified Power: “Flourish in Collaboration” Collaboration flourishes when skills vary. Strength lies in unity, and a mix of talents creates a powerhouse of cooperation. 🌱 Trust Building: “Strengthen Culture" Inclusive leadership fosters loyalty and trust. Encouraging growth shows you value your team members, creating a supportive environment. 🚀 Ensured Continuity: “Smooth Transition" Passing the baton ensures continuity. When your team can carry the torch, you're free to explore new horizons without being tied down. In short, the aim of any great leader is to make your daily responsibilities redundant. This is best achieved by hiring people better than you, and those that share a different perspective. Empower them, learn from them and the rest will take care of itself 🦋

"Woah!” Tomoko-san told me. “It’s so strange. In Japan, we say American culture is egalitarian. But after living in the US for two years, I now see their decision-making is much more hierarchical than ours.” Dirk from Germany confirmed: “Americans pretend they are egalitarian with their open-door policies, first-name basis, and casual dress, but when it comes to decision making - the boss makes the decision and everyone falls in line.” These quotes hit the core of a global leadership truth. Culture shapes two critical dimensions: 1. The Leading scale looks at how much deference or respect is shown to an authority figure. In egalitarian cultures, it’s ok to disagree with the boss even in front of others. It’s ok to email or call people several levels below or above you without putting the boss in copy. In hierarchical cultures, an effort is made to defer to the boss, especially in public, and communication follows the hierarchical chain. 2. The Deciding scale looks at whether we make decisions slowly over time by groups (consensual cultures) or whether decisions are made quickly by individuals (usually the boss) but then may be changed frequently as more information arises (what I call top-down cultures). These two dimensions create four very different leadership styles: 1. Hierarchical and top-down cultures (hello, China, India, Mexico, Russia, and Saudi Arabia) where deference/respect to authority is high and decisions are made by the boss. 2. Hierarchical but consensual decision-making (like Germany and especially Japan) – decisions are made slowly over time by groups, but deference to formal hierarchies is strong. 3. Egalitarian cultures that make quick top-down decisions (enter the United States or Australia), where anyone can speak up, but the boss still calls the final shot. 4. And then Consensual, egalitarian cultures (that's you, Denmark, Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden), where decision-making is slow, inclusive, and everyone’s voice holds weight. Each style is effective on its own. But a lot can go wrong when working across cultures, and these methods collide. Global leadership requires mapping your style to where you are and adapting like your success depends on it. Because it does. So, what quadrant do you lead in? Explore the map of your team here: erinmeyer.com/tools #TheCultureMap #GlobalLeadership #CrossCulturalLeadership #ErinMeyer #CultureMatters #LeadershipTruths

Clear long-term plans let me “retire” as an Amazon VP at 50, travel 5 months a year, and still make money. Here’s how I did it and how you can apply the same thinking to your own life. Bill Gates once said, “Most people overestimate what they can do in one year but underestimate what they can do in 10 years.” I agree. Here are four real long-term plans I’ve created: – A 5-year savings plan that let me retire – A 10-year travel plan to see the world – A 10-year business plan for impact – A 40-year health plan to stay fit through age 95 Plan 1: Retire in 5 Years As my career progressed, I started thinking about financial independence. I followed three simple financial rules throughout my life to make this a possibility: 1. Live on less than I make 2. Invest for the long term 3. Max out my 401(k) match In my 40s, I calculated how much I needed to retire and I realized I was about 5 years away. The plan stretched to 7.5 years, but I made it. Even if plans shift, having one gives you clarity and options. Plan 2: A Business Plan for Purpose Post-retirement, I built a 10-year business plan to help others find career success and satisfaction. The plan includes scaling my impact and reaching 1 million people. Like all good long-term plans, this one evolves, but the overarching vision stays constant. Plan 3: See the World I made a list of everywhere I wanted to go and started planning travel around those dreams. Galapagos. Iceland. Switzerland. This is my “active years” travel plan, and it only works because of Plan 1—financial freedom. But you don’t need to be wealthy to travel, just committed to a plan. Budget, partner with others, and get creative. Plan 4: Be Healthy at 95 This is the longest-range plan I’ve made. Inspired by Dr. Peter Attia’s concept of the “Centenarian Decathlon,” I mapped out what I want to be able to do at age 95 and then worked backward. If I want to lift a grandkid off the floor at 95, I need to be strong enough today. The details of each of these plans are in my newsletter. But before I link that, I want to give you some specific tips to create powerful long term plans: 1. Decide what area to focus on (my four plans were financial, business, travel, and health) Trying to create a single holistic life and career plan at this scale is likely too complex. Take it on in pieces. 2. Figure out where you want to be in 5, 10, or 40 years. What is the ultimate goal. 3. Work backwards from the end as well as forward from where you are. Meet in the middle. 4. Iterate. You can draft the plan all in one sitting, but these plans benefit from periodic revision. I have clarified, updated, and changed all of my plans once to twice a year. The end goals have rarely to never changed, but the next steps and priorities within the plan definitely do. 5. Be flexible. The plan exists to help you, not to constrain you. Link: https://buff.ly/03hEvz2 Readers—share your long-term plans.

Have you worked with someone who shifts blame when things go wrong? Or someone who takes credit for success but vanishes when challenges arise? Frustrating, right? Great leaders don’t pass the buck. They own their role, decisions, and outcomes. No excuses, no finger-pointing. Taking responsibility involves commitment to results, people, doing what’s right even when it’s hard. When leaders embrace this mindset: - Teams trust them - Work feels meaningful - Growth happens individually and collectively So, how do you embody this? 5 ways to lead with accountability: 1. Admit missteps. Perfection is a myth. Address errors head-on, find solutions, and move forward. 2. Be transparent. Keep everyone informed, not just when things are good. Clarity builds confidence. 3. Delegate with trust. Give people ownership, not just tasks. They’ll rise to the occasion when they feel empowered. 4 Set the standard. Work ethic isn’t spoken, it’s shown. Actions always outweigh words. 5 Acknowledge effort. Wins aren’t milestones alone, they drive people. Celebrate progress and recognize contributions. Accountability involves inspiring people to take ownership at every level. Remember this as you go through this week.

In high-stakes decisions, “right” and “wrong” aren’t the point. Your method for making decisions matters more than any single result. Every major choice is a bet on a particular future. Decision quality and outcome quality are two entirely different things. Our brains want tidy stories, so we judge a decision’s quality by its outcome — a bias known as resulting. A brilliant process can still produce a bad outcome because of one unlucky break. Pete Carroll’s infamous Super Bowl call to pass from the 1-yard line was statistically sound, yet it’s reviled because it ended in a game-losing interception. To escape the trap of resulting, you need a better process. The world’s best venture capitalists use repeatable frameworks that protect them from bias and focus their attention where it matters most. Their playbook starts with two disciplines: 𝟭. 𝗦𝗼𝗿𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀: 𝗢𝗻𝗲-𝗪𝗮𝘆 𝘃𝘀. 𝗧𝘄𝗼-𝗪𝗮𝘆 𝗗𝗼𝗼𝗿𝘀 Jeff Bezos uses this mental model to allocate energy: “Two-way doors” are reversible — make those decisions quickly quickly. “One-way doors” are consequential and nearly irreversible, so you should take them slow and deliberate. The first step to better decisions is knowing which door you’re facing. 𝟮. 𝗛𝘂𝗻𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗮𝘀𝘆𝗺𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗰 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝘀 Stop worrying about avoiding failure and start making sure your wins are big enough to make failures irrelevant. Don’t just assess the most likely outcome. Map the full range of possibilities. A bet with a 70% chance of a small loss but a 10% chance of a 100x return can be a career-defining win. Top VCs know they’ll be wrong most of the time. In fact, they’re not aiming to be right every time. They’re looking for situations where the upside of a win is exponentially larger than the downside of a loss. I’ll be diving deeper into the methodology behind high-quality decisions in my fall Maven cohort. It’s designed for entrepreneurs, investors, and exec decision makers who have to make dozens of decisions each day. Every decision is a bet on a forecast of the future. You have limited resources to figure out which prediction will have the best return in the long run. In my course, I’ll cover my 6-step process for better, faster decision making: https://bit.ly/4ljImns

Most teams don’t have a talent problem. They have a challenge problem. It’s not that people aren’t smart, skilled, or hardworking. It’s that they play it too safe in conversations, avoid tough questions, and hesitate to push each other’s thinking. 👇 The result? Slow decisions, missed opportunities, and a team that feels collaborative but isn’t truly high-performing. A leadership team I worked with had all the right ingredients: experience, ambition, and expertise, but their discussions stayed surface-level. They weren’t failing, but they weren’t excelling either. So, we made some tweaks.  Not by forcing more meetings, but by shifting how they work together. Here are 6 practices you can also try: 1️⃣ Mental Model Mapping Instead of debating what to do, map out how each team member thinks about a challenge. Ask everyone to write down: - What assumptions they are making - What past experiences shape their views - What risks they foresee Comparing these “mental maps” exposes team blind spots and enhances collective intelligence. 2️⃣ Curiosity Round Before giving feedback, asking this question first: “What was your thought process behind this?”. It opens up constructive dialogue instead of triggering defensiveness. 3️⃣ "Energy Audit" Method Instead of assigning tasks based only on skills, tracking what energizes or drains each team member helps optimize workflows and prevent burnout. 4️⃣ "Mistake-Learning" Sprint Once a month, instead of analyzing success stories, pick a past team failure and collaboratively discuss: - What went right despite the failure? - What invisible factors played a role? - How would we approach it differently now? 5️⃣ Red Team vs. Blue Team For big decisions, split the team into: - The Red Team (critics) who try to poke holes in the idea - The Blue Team (defenders) who justify why it will work This forces teams to think through risks and opportunities instead of making rushed choices. 6️⃣ One Bold Experiment Encourage teams to propose and test one out-of-the-box idea every quarter, with permission to fail. - Frame it as a low-risk experiment rather than a big change - Assign a “learning lead” to document what works - Celebrate insights, not just outcomes This keeps teams innovative without fear of failure. P.S.: Which one would make the biggest difference in your team? --------------------------------- Hi, I’m Susanna. I help leaders and organizations build high-performing teams through psychological safety and inclusive leadership. 🚀 Visit my website to book a free discovery call!

The leadership decision that changed everything for me? Learning to pause before deciding. Research shows leaders make up to 35,000 decisions daily. Your brain wasn't designed for this volume. But it can be trained. I see this especially with women leaders - pressured to decide quickly to prove competence. The cost? McKinsey found executives waste 37% of resources on poor choices made under pressure. When I work with senior women leaders, we start with one truth: Your brain on autopilot isn't your best leadership asset. Here's what happens when you bring mindfulness to your decisions: 1. Mental Noise Quiets Down → The constant chatter in your head calms → You hear yourself think clearly → The signals that matter become obvious → One healthcare executive told me: "I finally stopped second-guessing every choice" 2. Emotional Wisdom Grows → You notice feelings without being controlled by them → You respond rather than react → Your decisions come from clarity, not fear → A tech leader in our program reported: "I stopped making decisions from a place of proving myself" 3. Intuition Becomes Reliable → Your body's wisdom becomes accessible → You detect subtle signals others miss → Research shows mindful leaders make 29% more accurate intuitive judgments → A finance VP shared: "I can now tell the difference between fear and genuine caution" 4. Stress No Longer Drives Choices → Pressure doesn't cloud your thinking → You stay composed when stakes are high → Your team feels your steadiness → As one client put it: "My team now brings me real issues, not sanitized versions" Have you noticed how your best decisions rarely come when you're rushed or pressured? The women I coach aren't learning to decide slowly. They're learning to decide consciously. Try these practices: 1. Before high-stakes meetings, take three conscious breaths 2. Create a "decision journal" noting your state of mind when deciding 3. Schedule 10 minutes of quiet reflection before making important choices Your greatest leadership asset isn't your strategy. It's the quality of your presence in the moment of choice. What important decision are you facing that deserves your full presence? 📚 Explore practical decision frameworks in my book - The Conscious Choice 🔔 Follow Bhavna Toor for more research-backed wisdom on leading consciously 💬 DM me to learn how our leadership programs help women leaders make conscious choices that transform their impact

The higher the stakes, the harder it becomes to hear yourself think. When tension rises, the default is to speed up. Fill the silence. Push through uncertainty with urgency. But some of the worst decisions get made in that headspace. Clarity doesn’t come from pressure. It comes from presence. Simple practices like breath awareness and short pauses between meetings aren’t soft skills. They’re structure. They allow leaders to observe before reacting, and to respond without bringing yesterday’s stress into today’s conversation. Decision quality improves when the nervous system is calm. Not passive. Not disengaged. Just steady. I’ve found that centered leadership doesn’t just benefit the person making the call. It shifts the energy in the room. It creates space for better thinking, deeper listening, and more resilient outcomes. If you’re navigating complexity, try slowing down your response time—not your progress. Presence might be your most underused advantage.

Trust is built in drops and lost in buckets, and we’re running out of buckets. If you're leading teams through #AI adoption, navigating #hybrid work, or just steering through the tempest that is 2025, there's a crucial factor that could make or break your success: #trust. And right now, it's in free fall. Edelman's Trust Barometer showed an "unprecedented decline in employer trust" -- the first time in their 25 years tracking that trust in business fell. It's no surprise: midnight #layoff emails, "do more with less," #RTO mandates, and fears of #GenAI displacement given CEO focus on efficiency are all factors. The loss of #trust will impact performance. The Institute for Corporate Productivity (i4cp) research shows high performing organizations have 10-11X higher trust between employees and leaders. Trust impacts #engagement, #innovation and #technology adoption, especially AI. My latest newsletter gets beyond the research and into what leaders can do today to start rebuilding trust You can't command-and-control your way through a complete overhaul of how we work... Trust is a two-way street. Leaders need to go first, but we also have to rebuild the gives-and-takes of employer/employee relationships. Three starting points: 1️⃣ Clear Goals, Real Accountability. Stop monitoring attendance and start measuring outcomes. Give teams clear goals and autonomy in how they achieve them. 2️⃣ Transparency with Guardrails. Break down information silos. Share context behind decisions openly - even difficult ones. Establish guardrails for meaningful conversations internally (instead of rock-throwing externally). 3️⃣ Show Vulnerability. Saying "I don't know" isn't weakness–it's an invitation for others to contribute. The word “vulnerability” seems anathema to too many public figures at the moment, who instead are ready to lock themselves in the Octagon with their opponents. But what’s tougher for them: taking a swing at someone, or admitting to their own limitations? This isn't just about CEOs. Great leaders show up at all levels of the org chart, creating "trust bubbles:" pockets of high performance inside even the most challenging environments. If you're one of those folks, thank you for what you do! 👉 Link to the newsletter in comments; please read (it's free) and let me know what you think! #FutureOfWork #Leadership #Management #Culture