Compliance Standards for Smart Contracts

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

Summary

Compliance standards for smart contracts are rules and practices that ensure these digital agreements on blockchain platforms meet legal and regulatory requirements, particularly for assets like real estate and securities. These standards help guarantee that smart contracts are transparent, trustworthy, and enforce legal ownership and transfer restrictions.

  • Define ownership rules: Make sure your smart contract clearly states who can hold or transfer tokens, using built-in controls like whitelisting or identity-linked wallets to follow legal restrictions.
  • Use certification methods: Consider pursuing official smart contract certifications, whether through public authorities, auditors, or self-certification, and be ready to update or renew them when your contract changes.
  • Map legal to digital: Connect legal ownership structures directly to the smart contract code, so token ownership matches what’s recognized in law and during audits.
Summarized by AI based on LinkedIn member posts
  • View profile for Jay Schulman

    Blockchain & Digital Assets @ RSM 🏦 Disrupting accounting 📒 Innovating financial services 🦸

    8,565 followers

    Tokenize Real Estate? Not Without Asking These 3 Questions First Tokenizing real-world assets like real estate sounds like a no-brainer. Fractional ownership, liquidity, faster settlement—what’s not to like? But implementing it inside a traditional business model? That’s another story. Here’s where most projects go sideways: they skip the hard questions early and end up with tokenized assets no one can legally trade, or worse, can’t legally hold. If you’re leading a digital asset initiative, especially in real estate or other fixed assets, ask yourself (and your legal team) these three questions before writing a single line of smart contract code: 1. Who’s allowed to hold the token—and how do you enforce that on-chain? This isn’t just about KYC. Every asset class has built-in restrictions: accredited investor rules, jurisdictional caps, holding limits. Your token contract needs logic that enforces these rules without breaking compliance. And if you’re using a public blockchain, you’ll need whitelisting, transfer permissions, or even identity-linked wallets baked into your design. Ignore this and you build a liability, not a product. 2. How do you map legal ownership to token ownership? You can’t just say “own the token, own the asset” and assume it’ll hold up under audit or litigation. You need a legal wrapper—typically a special purpose vehicle (SPV) or trust—where the SPV owns the asset and the token represents equity or a profit-share stake in that entity. Your legal model must be tied directly to the token mechanics and codified in both operating agreements and smart contracts. 3. What happens when things go wrong—foreclosures, investor exits, or token freezes? Compliance doesn’t end at issuance. It’s about what happens when the unexpected hits. Blockchain may be immutable, but business risk isn’t. You need off-chain procedures mapped to on-chain authorities: who can pause trading, burn tokens, or initiate clawbacks? If the answer is “we’ll figure it out when we get there,” you’re already exposed. There’s a right way to bring traditional assets on-chain—and it starts with legal, not tech. Done correctly, tokenization reduces friction, builds transparency, and opens global liquidity. But only if you anchor your strategy in compliance from day one. How is your team navigating the legal-to-blockchain handoff on tokenized assets? Let’s share lessons—the real ones, not the polished slide decks.

  • View profile for Sharat Chandra

    Blockchain & Emerging Tech Evangelist | Startup Enabler

    46,292 followers

    #Blockchain | #SmartContracts : Report of the Working group on Smart Contract Certification . Key Findings of the Report - 1. Certification Standards: The working group proposed high-level safety principles for smart contracts, emphasizing the importance of best practices in software design and risk mitigation from execution environments. The report outlines that smart contract code should be deterministic, meaning it should produce the same output given the same input, ensuring transparency for users 2. Audit Methods: Current audit practices are based on traditional IT audits, but the group suggests an additional step for certification decisions. Three certification schemes were identified: Certification by a public authority based on an authorized audit. Direct certification by the auditor. Self-certification by the provider, subject to later oversight 3. Validity Period: The report discusses options for certification validity, suggesting either a fixed period (e.g., three years) or a duration dependent on the contract's complexity. Any significant changes to a smart contract would necessitate re-certification

  • View profile for Bart Cant

    Startup Founder Msg2ai / Founder Rethink Labs / Founder AI & Digital Asset Innovation Council

    13,291 followers

    "𝗨𝗻𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲: 𝗘𝗥𝗖-𝟯𝟲𝟰𝟯 𝗣𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗥𝗪𝗔 𝗧𝗼𝗸𝗲𝗻𝗶𝘇𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗢𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁" 🚀 ERC3643 Association introduces a new UI plug-in tool for #DeFi protocols to enforce compliance with the ERC3643 standard, also known as the T-REX standard, an extension of ERC-20. 🛠️ ERC3643 tokens are permissioned and use #smartcontracts to define conditional transfer functions, allowing #decentralized validators to approve transactions based on predetermined rules, particularly for regulated #assets like securities. 🔒 The collaboration between ERC3643 Association, DevPro, and Tokeny led to the development of the UI tool, enabling ERC-20-compliant DeFi applications to interact with permissioned ERC-3643 tokens, covering various assets including #realworldassets, token securities, loyalty tokens, stablecoins, and CBDCs. 🤝 ERC3643 embeds compliance rules at a token level, ensuring interoperability with ERC-20-supporting applications while denying transactions if counterparties fail to meet compliance requirements. 🔄 Unlike other standards using wallet whitelisting for KYC checks, ERC3643 utilizes digital identity and verifiable credentials for user whitelisting, ensuring on-chain compliance validation while protecting privacy by publishing only proofs of verification on-chain. Companies such as APEX Group and Aztec Group are exploring this technology. 🔍 Source : https://lnkd.in/e7rtSFib Gregory Stone, Ken Chapman, Luc Falempin, Dennis O'Connell, Ivie S., Kostiantyn Dmitriiev, Joachim Lebrun, Sunny Jiang, Herbert Si, Hubert J.P. Jolly, Arijit Das, Collin Sellers

Explore categories