I cringe when I hear the words “blunt feedback”. We like to think feedback should always be given, no matter what. We’re almost aggressively pro-feedback. But the reality is more nuanced. Not all feedback is helpful. If it undermines confidence, triggers defensiveness, or comes at the wrong moment, it can do more harm than good. Timing matters as much as content. Sometimes, holding back and choosing the right moment makes the feedback far more effective than delivering it immediately. Tone also matters. Your team might not be as passionate about constant feedback as you might be. Be thoughtful, intentional, and aware of its impact. We are not robots. Feedback should work at an emotional level. It should build, guide, and empower. Not just check a box. Because it’s not about how much feedback you give. It’s about how much change it brings.
Very true. I have seen instances where feedbacks have done more harm than good
Who gives the feedback matters a lot. Based on this the receiver can decide whether to consider or dispel. Feedback is not criticism or an outcome of biased assessment or at times, provoked statements. It must be constructive based on an intelligent judgement on the potential, performance and the environment which is only possible when the giver is qualified. And these are very few.
Very true. I have seen instances where feedbacks have done more harm than good